Bangkok, Thailand - 2007
Sep 09
That nationwide
motorcycle sales
from January to July
of this year were
down 16 per cent
from the same period
last year, as
reported in the
August 30 edition of
Krungthep Turakij,
will come as a
surprise only to
those in the
business who felt
the drop to be
steeper.
In addition to the
high oil prices of
recent years that have
discouraged consumers
from buying new vehicles
(as well as wiped out
the less efficient
two-stroke engines), the
depressed economy also
has had a profound
effect on sales. And
that's before taking
into account the damages
wrought in agricultural
areas by last year's
devastating floods. The
ubiquitous promotion
offering "free Jatukam
amulets" to would-be
motorcycle-buyers seen
in many provinces
doesn't appear to be
working at the moment.
However, the business
has had it worse during
the post-1997 years.
Although the
repossession rate is now
climbing again, at least
this time around there
haven't (yet) been cases
of criminal gangs going
from province to
province and hiring
cash-strapped locals to
buy motorbikes on small
down payments and
smuggle the vehicles
across the border to
sell.
Along with mobile
phones, motorcycles were
often viewed in the
capital as one of the
luxury items that
"grass-roots" people
rushed to buy with free
handouts from ex-prime
minister Thaksin's
village-fund scheme. For
the great majority in
the country, however,
motorbikes are actually
a necessity. They not
only cover functions
served in Bangkok by
cars, like going to work
or taking the children
to school - at a
fraction of the price -
but for many they are
essential for making a
living. Bangkok would
have to say goodbye to
durians, for example,
and many other
agricultural products,
if there were no
motorbikes to transport
them out of difficult
terrain.
That's why motorbikes
are hand-down Thailand's
vehicle of choice and a
good guide to the health
of the economy. For a
market of one to two
million units annually,
the four major players,
all Thai-Japanese joint
ventures, are constantly
at each other's throats
by releasing new models,
their equivalent to
"populist policies".
Unsurprisingly, all
kinds of marketing ploys
are also utilised to win
the hearts of buyers.
The business probably
uses more celebrity
models than any other
durable product.
A few years ago when
cheap imports from China
were banging at the
gate, there was a panic
among established local
manufacturers. They
hurried to design more
cost-effective models,
with the overall result
that motorcycles became
cheaper. It was the
consumers who profited.
In the end,
undoubtedly after
furious lobbying, the
door was shut to Chinese
imports. One can only
wonder how much more of
a benefit would have
been derived from the
extra competition. This
is not to say that the
Chinese products would
in the end prevail. Most
likely, as with
electrical appliances,
consumers would discover
that the cheapest
product is unlikely to
be the best, but there
would certainly have
been progress from the
learning experience. But
now we will never know,
because faith in the
opinions of the common
people has always been
lacking in this country.
Upon first looking at
consumer choices, it
doesn't seem that people
always make rational
decisions, as the
best-selling motorbikes
are often not the ones
with the best designs or
mechanics. But before
writing them off as
ignoramuses, as when
they "sell out" to
Thaksin's populist
policies, one needs to
look deeper to
understand the logic
involved in the
democracy of choice. One
thing that is certain is
that nobody buys a
motorbike based on petty
freebies.
Even more than price,
the public's perception
of a brand is critical
in purchase decisions.
Honda's quality control,
which is bolstered by
its carefully crafted
image, accounts for much
of the company's
continuing success
across the country, with
roughly two-thirds of
market share.
Innovations are also
rewarded. Yamaha's foray
into "automatic"
motorbikes paid off
handsomely and is now
followed even by the
market leader. What
won't sell a product, on
the other hand, is an
elitist attitude
unresponsive to the
interest and opinions of
"buyers".
In his famous 1974
novel cum philosophy
exposition "Zen and the
Art of Motorcycle
Maintenance: An Inquiry
into Values", Richard
Pirsig made "quality"
his central theme while
refusing to define it.
In the same vein, this
government seems to take
a Zen-like approach to
economy. While scanning
the sky for largely
undefined "gross
national happiness", the
administration is
perceived to give short
shrift to "fingers
pointing toward the
moon", namely economic
indices and numbers.
That consumers are
sealing their purses may
thus be read as a
commentary on the lack
of choice and clear
direction. It's as if
all motorcycle companies
had been, for the sake
of unity, merged into
one monopoly with no
market-research
department. Who can
blame them for wanting
different products from
beyond these borders,
even if the products are
toxic?
Some people will
remember Tiger
motorbikes, which soon
after 1997 rode into the
country's consciousness
as Thailand's own
motorcycle brand. Now
Tiger, as Thanin has
done for televisions and
radios before it, looks
to have proven again
that lofty idealism is
no substitute for a
sound business model.
As customers stay
away, those in the
motorcycle business
meanwhile can use their
new-found free time to
learn the official
doublespeak where c-r-i-s-i-s
is pronounced
"opportunity", and b-a-d
spells "good", while
patiently waiting for
the election to bring an
end to this "interesting
time". May they have
what they wish for.
Paisarn
Likhitpreechakul
Bangkok
Paisarn
Likhitpreechakul is a
freelance writer. His
family began business as
a motorcycle dealership
when he was seven.
Despite his lifelong
attempts to run away
from the business, fate
would not hear of it.
|